it's interesting because if we stretch the elastic even more, can a heroin or crack cocaine frequent user be considered "normal", let's say "not addicted" if their use fall in this description we just found?
If the behavior makes the user happy and it's not a problem for them (or people around them)... would it be ok? supposing it's legal, of course.
this line of thinking can spark interesting conversations on morality, ethics and behavior.
Yes, that's usually fine. It depends on the substance though because they come with different levels of addiction.
For example if someone simply tries one time marijuana, they will not be addicted if they never do it again.
But, if anyone tries heroine or a similar drug once, they will be addicted forever.
The problem lies in the brain. Some chemicals give you such a high in the first dose that you can never get back to it.
That's called chasing the dragon.
Basically imagine the best feeling you have lived in your entire life. Multiply it by a hundred. That's what a person gets when they get heroin or similar substances in their bodies.
They can never experience that level of happiness, or joy, etc, outside of the chemical, so they end up doing it over and over, with decreasing power. It's quite sad.
I don't really believe on being addicted forever by one use.
There's also the difference between behavioral addiction and chemical, quite different when you make something a habit than when your body could breakdown due to stop of using one substance
long term heroin users, as an example, can't simply stop using it out of nowhere otherwise they breakdown, at least I saw something about it in the past
regarding using cannabis once,
what if you use it once a week? what about alcohol? a drink a day is ok?
the subject of frequency of use varies a lot from person to person and is quite subjective as well
connects with genetics, behavior, culture, resistance to each substance or how it affects you
quite interesting.