Topic: Do you think Lightlord behavior is acceptable? - page 10. (Read 4311 times)

Well...

Well...

Well...

If you checked his posts, he has been actually managing his side project and hiring some new positions, roughly 15 weeks ago.

This is the case that means she is looking for a reason not to pay campaign participants. This should not be a good reason for not paying, this is have nothing to do with the participant because participants are not tagging him or not taking any action. The tag has been given by DT members, just put a warning, so before joining users will be aware of his activities. There would happen any problem so Lightlord should explain the situation and payout. The red tag is removable, if he can show a reasonable reason, then obviously DT members would reconsider the red tag.

I have remembered a few days back regarding at scam allegation, I have sent PM to Lightlord about the allegation because it was looked legit to me.  But I hadn't got any response from him even he was online, nor did anyone from his support team respond to the allegation. This isn't the right way to handle a campaign or allegation at all.

@CryptopreneurBrainboss, the community would ask as well to you why have you run a campaign for TEN weeks since Lightlord not paying? You can't ignore your responsibility as well. Hope you are trying your best to resolve the allegation about the participant's payments.

So lightlord came online and has not given answer to anyone and not even replied to the campaign manager, dont know he even read all this or not. It would be better if he left some message on what is the issue so that all the participants could have get a bit relaxed. For now it is still a mystery when we gonna get paid.

You need to take a chill pill, Pal. 

No one has accused you of anything.

I was also a part of the campaign and BrainBoss managed it perfectly.
The only drawback is that lightlord paying late and some participants had problem due to them needing the money in their Life but it was never a problem for me.

I would also suggest that it's not the Fault of BrainBoss that things turned out this way and It's wouldn't be wise to tag him for something that's mentioned on thread regarding payments.

I was the part of one the campaign (777coin) for years but recently i left the campaign few months before. I had the experience of getting the late payments but they were always paid and with bonus too. I never thought all this awkward situation will develop one day.

I hope Light Lord pay to his loyal signature fellows who trusted him and worked for 10 weeks without pay.  I hope he will not break the trust of so many people.

Narcissist?

I will tell you what is narcissistic.

Narcissistic is to keep insisting that you know my trust settings better based on loyce.club instead of what I base them on, which is my trust settings.

Narcissistic is accusing me of being a narcissist for supposedly wanting an hourly or daily update of loyce.club when I don't give a damn when it updates because I see custom trust list instantly in my trust settings.

And narcissistic is to keep insisting on this topic in this thread that goes about Lightlord's reputation, when I have already asked that if something is to be commented on this, it should be commented on in LoyceV's thread.

I understand that threads usually drift a bit off topic, but if I see just one more comment about this in this thread I'm going to report it for off-topic.

Does this seem narcissistic enough to you?

Going back to the topic:


I understand that Brainboss is more concerned because he is also owed money from managing two campaigns during all this time. It must be a respectable amount and more for someone living in Nigeria.

I believe, Brainboss, that there is no need to be afraid. Lightlord should pay because if not instead of getting 4 negative feedbacks saying he pays late, he will get more than a dozen feedbacks saying he is a scammer. There are people who have some negative feedbacks and keep working on the forum, like for example Best Change, and you know it.

I in my case changed the feedback from neutral to negative because after rereading about the trust system, I didn't see the point of my feedback being neutral. I didn't put it neutral from the beginning because Lightlord has been on the forum for a long time, he is a donator, etc.

Zodiac1233 is not in DT or in anyone's trust list.

The trust pages are updated once per week (only a narcissist would want an hourly, or even a daily update) the two examples I have quoted have information - if you know what to look for. In the case of your own trust list, you can review who you have previously trusted/distrusted, while in the other example I show that lightlord (the subject of this thread) is DT trusted by Zodiac1233.

If Zodiac1233 is an alt, then it's trust abuse... QED

So. If it's 3 days old and I started another one yesterday, it won't appear. Let's keep these discussion for your trust thread.

10 weeks in arrear? That's insane!

@Timelord2067 and @LoyceV

Loyce.club needs to be updated, then. That data is 12 days old. Look at the date of the link.

Are you really worried that he may run away because of a few negative tags on his profile? No, I don't think so. This isn't the first time this has happened and trust feedback can very easily be changed to neutral. By the way, what timeframe did you specify? I thought you said the last payment was over ten weeks ago? Not to add insult to injury, but you shouldn't have allowed this amount of debt to accumulate. Not with lightlord's reliability in question.

Anyway, am I the only one who sees a bit of silver lining in putting these campaigns "on hold"? I have a feeling the moderators will finally get some well-deserved rest. 

When you create a default trust list (as opposed to a trust feedback post) it will look something like this:

https://loyce.club/trust/2021-10-09_Sat_06.10h/21720.html

---

---

Currently, your own trust list looks like this:

https://loyce.club/trust/2021-10-09_Sat_06.10h/2836461.html (note you can go back through the weeks and review your changes in previous week's).

No, that was my dog.

Can't you see my current list?

I have now started to make another one, and although I have reread your thread, I think it will take me a while to understand 100% how it works. I will probably go to your thread to ask dummie questions (or my dog will go).

Lets say he pays what he owes and he wants to continue the campaign, he should use an escrow to hold the fund for the campaign at least for few rounds as what he did last year when Hhampuz hold the address 1BitvestxmKKNRjxyHh5Mn1iWovFzs93Hr so the same mistake will not repeat again in the future.

Did you wipe it by accident?

Report the thread, so a Mod can lock it.

He hasn't but I'm quite sure he has seen my message, and from the look of things he has also seem this thread because the red tagged are quite visible now.

I don't know if he'll pay or not which is why I was of the opinion of giving him more time to login in first before decision were taken on tagging him. The tags doesn't make it any easier as he can decide not to pay now since even though he pays the tags would likely not be removed. Participants are been owned here for 10weeks and I was looking for a means of making it easier for them to get paid first before actions are taken.

Maybe a neutral would had been best to warned then after a specific time when we have confirmed he doesn't want to pay then flags and red tagged would be initiated but guess we have to see how it plays out now. Well the community knows best so we'll go with them and hopefully it plays out to our favour.

From recollection, both signature campaigns (although paid in Bitcoin) are also calculated per post in Bitcoin too (in much the same way that coin mixing service was until very recently). Am I remembering this correctly?

With the price if Bitcoin rapidly rising over the last ten weeks. Lightlord etc might not be able to source enough Bitcoin with their funds at hand.