Any negative trust he receives should be removed once he catches up on payments.
I disagree with that, since this is the second time his campaign participants have had serious issues with payment. It's just not acceptable behavior, and I thought I was being generous last time by changing my negative to a neutral. This time I think he's earned a neg, regardless of what reasons or excuses he has for not paying out and not communicating. Enough is enough with this guy.
Props to Foxpup and DarkStar_, by the way.
Neither of whom have participated in this thread - what is their connection?
That's an open secret, where have you been?
Lets give him some more time, and if there's no welcoming development then I'll have to stop campaign and the tags can start coming in. For now the story is he's sick so please lets give him that benefit of doubt for couple of weeks.
How much more time are you willing to give him? I think you ought to come up with a hard deadline before entreating the campaigners to be patient, because this could go on and on indefinitely. I understand you don't want to end the campaign, but there comes a time in situations like this where you have to cut bait and move on.
Many members wouldn't stand a chance in other campaign if this campaign was to be forcedly closed due to the negative feedback it'll receive assuming its intact isn't to scam which I strongly believe so, as much as other present participants of both campaigns.
I don't understand your argument about members not being able to get into other campaigns. If that's true, that would be because they're shitposters, not because they were involved with your campaign. Nobody's going to neg you or your participants because they were associated with lightlord, if that's what you're thinking.
.
