Remember Russian general who was talking about combat mosquitos and American laboratories in Ukraine? Well, he was exploded tonight in Moscow:
https://mil.in.ua/en/news/explosion-in-moscow-kills-russian-general-linked-to-chemical-attacks/
Not for the first time in this war I'm amazed how long hands of Ukrainian SBU is, it reminds me Mossad. If you're somehow related with war, even being so far away from front line you can't feel safe.
Topic: Russian Invasion of Ukraine[In Progress] - page 9. (Read 78843 times)
Now Branko, please, damage assessment of a chunk of metal falling randomly on a city.
Yes trust that *wink wink*. BTW again the Trident is an american missile... as old and reliable as rain and taxes.
UK used to have lots of great physicists, but sadly it seems they don't teach physics in school anymore.
But in case there is some old teacher left nearby, go ask him to calculate energy of 36 tonnes
arriving at you at Mach 10
If the regime cannot be removed from inside Russia, then Ukraine and the West will help, I think so.
...
https://en.defence-ua.com/weapon_and_tech/the_ukrainian_peklo_cruise_missile_or_missile_drone_what_can_be_inferred_from_photos_regarding_its_characteristics_and_capabilities-12772.html
According to public information, it's range is about 700km and speed is up to 700 km/h with warhead up to 50kg.
It's all cool, but main issue is mass production. Ukraine is capable to make quality drones and missiles, but they can't produce significant number of it.
Ukrainians created good missiles, of course, not without the help of the West, but still good ones. Are there any characteristics of them somewhere, or is it still a secret?
If you're asking about most recent missile-drone Peklo, here you go:https://en.defence-ua.com/weapon_and_tech/the_ukrainian_peklo_cruise_missile_or_missile_drone_what_can_be_inferred_from_photos_regarding_its_characteristics_and_capabilities-12772.html
According to public information, it's range is about 700km and speed is up to 700 km/h with warhead up to 50kg.
It's all cool, but main issue is mass production. Ukraine is capable to make quality drones and missiles, but they can't produce significant number of it.
Just for some perspective, here's the specs on the 80 year old piston engine Mosquito from WW-II:
Max Speed: 668 km/h (comp. 700km/h)
Range: 2100 km (comp. 700km)
Bomb Load: 1800kg (comp. 50kg)
True, the range goes down significantly with a full bomb load, but the numbers are so dominating that a pretty healthy adjustment could be made.
I'll go with the Oreshnik, thank you very much.
That is ballpark correct. You should be asking yourself how a "mosquito", not even that, but rather a recreational plane has gone all the way to an Ahmad camp hundreds of miles and f*ed. It is a simple solution but it is enough because Ruzzia simply does not have enough equipment to cover all the critical targets.
So, you rebranded missile "Orezznik" will make either a doomsday nuclear strike, followed by retalation, or a few random holes in the ground. The cheap, humble propeller plane with some home-made chunk of high explosive with put out of commission a multi-billion oil facility.
I really hope that your handlers and the generals go for the "orezznik". It simply would take a radical mentality swing to change the way the Ruzzian army thinks, too much for the old psichopaths on top.
History is showing that it was the US following the years after the dissolution of the USSR, who broke agreements and is causing the war in Ukraine.
The Long Train of Abuses that Culminated in the Ukraine War
https://libertarianinstitute.org/articles/the-long-train-of-abuses-that-culminated-in-the-ukraine-war/
But within that sphere, Horton is a fox, weaving an encyclopedic knowledge of various conflicts into an elaborate and convincing tapestry that indicts elites, intellectuals, the military-industrial complex, and—with characteristic vitriol—neoconservatives in pushing the US toward unnecessary wars.
Provoked: How Washington Started the New Cold War with Russia and the Catastrophe in Ukraine, fits this mold to a tee—not because Horton contorts facts to a preconceived narrative. Rather, because it is often the same people pushing conflict after conflict who, unsurprisingly, resort to the same, well-worn playbook. Horton's tome is riveting, from beginning to end. Here, I will focus on the early post-Cold War years, since this part of the story is oft-neglected in contemporary debates about the origins of the Ukraine war.
With the closing of the Cold War, and the USSR dissolving, the U.S. faced a crisis of success: what use is the NATO military alliance without the Soviet enemy to align against? More broadly, what grand strategy should the US adopt now that containing communism was obsolete? For neoconservatives, whose answer post-Cold War was benevolent global hegemony, the solution was to adapt NATO. NATO must gradually absorb more European nations, while leaving Russia out in the cold—contained and encircled, in an even worse position than during the Cold War. NATO must expand its mission to keep European peace and expand Western democracy, or wither on the vine.
From George H.W. Bush to today, the record meticulously compiled by Horton demonstrates that U.S. and other Western leaders communicated to Russia leaders and officials that NATO would not expand east—and could even allow for Russian membership in NATO. Various efforts like the Partnership for Peace and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe were promoted to foster this impression that Russia would be included in European affairs, alliances, and institutions, rather than these structures aligning against them. All the while, these same US and Western leaders took virtually the opposite positions internally, with the result that the US willfully misled the Russians. The exact internal and external postures waxed and waned over the years, but this ultimate pattern held firm. This was even though, all along, Russian officials warned about how they and the Russian people would react to NATO advancing east. What we see is, in terms with which Americans are well-familiar, "a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object."
...
The US, and particularly the Biden Administration, is pushing Russia into what might be WW3. If Putin somehow can hold off on the retaliation long enough for Trump to get in, things might change enough to save us all.
Putin: West Pushing Russia BEYOND 'Red Line'
https://www.infowars.com/posts/putin-west-pushing-russia-beyond-red-line
"The tactic is very simple: they push us to 'a red line', from which we can not retreat, we start to respond and then they immediately scare their population – in the old days it was with the Soviet threat and now it's with the Russian threat," Putin said Monday, according to the Huffington Post.
The Russian President also discussed plans by the U.S. to deploy more advanced missile systems near Russian borders, also stating that some of this deployment is already underway.
"The U.S. activity to create and prepare for the deployment of ground-based high-accuracy strike weapons with a range of up to 5,500 kilometers in forward zones is worrisome," Putin said Monday according to TASS (the Russian News Agency).
"The essence of what the U.S. is trying to do with regard to Russia is to push it to its red line and then scare the American people with claims of a Russian threat," TASS (the Russian News Agency) said Monday.
In a hubris-filled article by The Atlantic Council, Russia's red lines were mocked in flagrant disregard to the risk of world-ending nuclear conflict.
"One last positive point here: Politics is rich with irony, and the U.S. debate on Russian aggression in Ukraine is no exception. The reason for Biden's timidity was that Putin got into his head with his nuclear threats, even as Ukraine and the West moved past numerous Kremlin 'red lines' with no sight of a mushroom cloud on the horizon," The Atlantic Council said November 18.
Regardless of Western outlets and think tanks flirting with ending the world in a game of 'poke the bear', Russia claims it may be forced to respond.
The West has already stepped over previous Russian red lines without yet being nuked, such as invading Russia with Ukraine and allowing Ukraine to strike Russia with long-range missiles.
"The West's support for Ukraine is pushing Russia to the point where it cannot help but retaliate," RT said Monday, summarizing Putin's statements.
On November 19 Ukraine began launching U.S.-made long-range missiles deep into Russia under the approval and guidance of the lame-duck Joe Biden administration, a move that Russia now allows a nuclear retaliation to. These events followed a Russian warning to the West against such actions.
...
The Long Train of Abuses that Culminated in the Ukraine War
https://libertarianinstitute.org/articles/the-long-train-of-abuses-that-culminated-in-the-ukraine-war/
But within that sphere, Horton is a fox, weaving an encyclopedic knowledge of various conflicts into an elaborate and convincing tapestry that indicts elites, intellectuals, the military-industrial complex, and—with characteristic vitriol—neoconservatives in pushing the US toward unnecessary wars.
Provoked: How Washington Started the New Cold War with Russia and the Catastrophe in Ukraine, fits this mold to a tee—not because Horton contorts facts to a preconceived narrative. Rather, because it is often the same people pushing conflict after conflict who, unsurprisingly, resort to the same, well-worn playbook. Horton's tome is riveting, from beginning to end. Here, I will focus on the early post-Cold War years, since this part of the story is oft-neglected in contemporary debates about the origins of the Ukraine war.
With the closing of the Cold War, and the USSR dissolving, the U.S. faced a crisis of success: what use is the NATO military alliance without the Soviet enemy to align against? More broadly, what grand strategy should the US adopt now that containing communism was obsolete? For neoconservatives, whose answer post-Cold War was benevolent global hegemony, the solution was to adapt NATO. NATO must gradually absorb more European nations, while leaving Russia out in the cold—contained and encircled, in an even worse position than during the Cold War. NATO must expand its mission to keep European peace and expand Western democracy, or wither on the vine.
From George H.W. Bush to today, the record meticulously compiled by Horton demonstrates that U.S. and other Western leaders communicated to Russia leaders and officials that NATO would not expand east—and could even allow for Russian membership in NATO. Various efforts like the Partnership for Peace and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe were promoted to foster this impression that Russia would be included in European affairs, alliances, and institutions, rather than these structures aligning against them. All the while, these same US and Western leaders took virtually the opposite positions internally, with the result that the US willfully misled the Russians. The exact internal and external postures waxed and waned over the years, but this ultimate pattern held firm. This was even though, all along, Russian officials warned about how they and the Russian people would react to NATO advancing east. What we see is, in terms with which Americans are well-familiar, "a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object."
...
The US, and particularly the Biden Administration, is pushing Russia into what might be WW3. If Putin somehow can hold off on the retaliation long enough for Trump to get in, things might change enough to save us all.
Putin: West Pushing Russia BEYOND 'Red Line'
https://www.infowars.com/posts/putin-west-pushing-russia-beyond-red-line
"The tactic is very simple: they push us to 'a red line', from which we can not retreat, we start to respond and then they immediately scare their population – in the old days it was with the Soviet threat and now it's with the Russian threat," Putin said Monday, according to the Huffington Post.
The Russian President also discussed plans by the U.S. to deploy more advanced missile systems near Russian borders, also stating that some of this deployment is already underway.
"The U.S. activity to create and prepare for the deployment of ground-based high-accuracy strike weapons with a range of up to 5,500 kilometers in forward zones is worrisome," Putin said Monday according to TASS (the Russian News Agency).
"The essence of what the U.S. is trying to do with regard to Russia is to push it to its red line and then scare the American people with claims of a Russian threat," TASS (the Russian News Agency) said Monday.
In a hubris-filled article by The Atlantic Council, Russia's red lines were mocked in flagrant disregard to the risk of world-ending nuclear conflict.
"One last positive point here: Politics is rich with irony, and the U.S. debate on Russian aggression in Ukraine is no exception. The reason for Biden's timidity was that Putin got into his head with his nuclear threats, even as Ukraine and the West moved past numerous Kremlin 'red lines' with no sight of a mushroom cloud on the horizon," The Atlantic Council said November 18.
Regardless of Western outlets and think tanks flirting with ending the world in a game of 'poke the bear', Russia claims it may be forced to respond.
The West has already stepped over previous Russian red lines without yet being nuked, such as invading Russia with Ukraine and allowing Ukraine to strike Russia with long-range missiles.
"The West's support for Ukraine is pushing Russia to the point where it cannot help but retaliate," RT said Monday, summarizing Putin's statements.
On November 19 Ukraine began launching U.S.-made long-range missiles deep into Russia under the approval and guidance of the lame-duck Joe Biden administration, a move that Russia now allows a nuclear retaliation to. These events followed a Russian warning to the West against such actions.
...
...
https://en.defence-ua.com/weapon_and_tech/the_ukrainian_peklo_cruise_missile_or_missile_drone_what_can_be_inferred_from_photos_regarding_its_characteristics_and_capabilities-12772.html
According to public information, it's range is about 700km and speed is up to 700 km/h with warhead up to 50kg.
It's all cool, but main issue is mass production. Ukraine is capable to make quality drones and missiles, but they can't produce significant number of it.
Ukrainians created good missiles, of course, not without the help of the West, but still good ones. Are there any characteristics of them somewhere, or is it still a secret?
If you're asking about most recent missile-drone Peklo, here you go:https://en.defence-ua.com/weapon_and_tech/the_ukrainian_peklo_cruise_missile_or_missile_drone_what_can_be_inferred_from_photos_regarding_its_characteristics_and_capabilities-12772.html
According to public information, it's range is about 700km and speed is up to 700 km/h with warhead up to 50kg.
It's all cool, but main issue is mass production. Ukraine is capable to make quality drones and missiles, but they can't produce significant number of it.
Just for some perspective, here's the specs on the 80 year old piston engine Mosquito from WW-II:
Max Speed: 668 km/h (comp. 700km/h)
Range: 2100 km (comp. 700km)
Bomb Load: 1800kg (comp. 50kg)
True, the range goes down significantly with a full bomb load, but the numbers are so dominating that a pretty healthy adjustment could be made.
I'll go with the Oreshnik, thank you very much.
It's cool that Grozny was bombed today, I'm very glad that Kadyrov is angry 
Seems that they don't have air defence in Grozny as they triedvto shoot down drone with a riffle.Unfortunately, it seems that this plane/drone didn't hit important target and didn't made much damage.
Ukrainians created good missiles, of course, not without the help of the West, but still good ones. Are there any characteristics of them somewhere, or is it still a secret?
If you're asking about most recent missile-drone Peklo, here you go:https://en.defence-ua.com/weapon_and_tech/the_ukrainian_peklo_cruise_missile_or_missile_drone_what_can_be_inferred_from_photos_regarding_its_characteristics_and_capabilities-12772.html
According to public information, it's range is about 700km and speed is up to 700 km/h with warhead up to 50kg.
It's all cool, but main issue is mass production. Ukraine is capable to make quality drones and missiles, but they can't produce significant number of it.
Ukrainians created good missiles, of course, not without the help of the West, but still good ones. Are there any characteristics of them somewhere, or is it still a secret?
Here we go again. Will Ukraine never learn that they are going to be destroyed if they keep 'teasing' Russia like this? Will Russia in retaliation take Kiev out this time? Pretty soon it won't matter if this is a war between Ukraine and Russia, or if it's between the US and Russia. The US might want it to look like Russia is the bad guy. But it won't matte if Russia has to protect itself.
ONE MORE TIME: Ukraine strikes Russia again with U.S.-made ATACMS missiles, escalating tensions
https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-12-15-ukraine-strikes-russia-with-atacms-missiles-again.html
Ukraine used U.S.-supplied ATACMS long-range missiles to target a military airfield in Taganrog, Russia, on Dec. 11, escalating tensions between the two countries.
The attack injured Russian servicemen and caused damage to administrative buildings, vehicles and an industrial site in the region, with several cars burned.
Out of six missiles, two were intercepted and destroyed. Russia's electronic warfare capabilities disrupted the remaining four, causing them to miss the intended target, resulting in minor damage.
The Russian Defense Ministry warned of a firm retaliation against the "Western long-range weapons" attack, stating that it will not go unanswered.
The use of ATACMS missiles, capable of carrying nuclear payloads, has heightened international concern. Russia’s threats of nuclear retaliation have increased the risk of a broader conflict, emphasizing the need for diplomatic resolutions.
In a dramatic turn of events, Ukraine has once more launched a missile strike against Russian territory using United States-supplied ATACMS long-range systems.
The attack Wednesday, Dec. 11, targeted a military airfield in Taganrog, a southern Russian city, and further escalates tensions between the warring nations. According to the Russian Ministry of Defense (MOD), six ATACMS missiles were involved in the assault. While two of the missiles were intercepted and destroyed, the remaining four were reportedly disrupted by Russia's electronic warfare capabilities, causing them to deviate from their intended target.
Despite the apparent defense measures, the attack resulted in minor damage, with shrapnel from falling debris hitting two administrative buildings and several vehicles on the airfield. Acting Rostov Region Gov. Yury Slyusar provided additional details, confirming that the missiles also struck an industrial site in the region, where some 15 cars in the parking lot were burned.
The incident has sparked heated reactions both in Russia and internationally, as the U.S. and Ukraine move closer to the brink of a more severe conflict. Photographs released in the aftermath of the attack show damaged buildings and scattered debris, adding a stark visual testimony to the volatile nature of the ongoing conflict. Although the scale of casualties remains unclear, it was reported that Russian servicemen sustained injuries, underscoring the human cost of the exchange.
Russian Defense Ministry vows firm retaliation
...
ONE MORE TIME: Ukraine strikes Russia again with U.S.-made ATACMS missiles, escalating tensions
https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-12-15-ukraine-strikes-russia-with-atacms-missiles-again.html
Ukraine used U.S.-supplied ATACMS long-range missiles to target a military airfield in Taganrog, Russia, on Dec. 11, escalating tensions between the two countries.
The attack injured Russian servicemen and caused damage to administrative buildings, vehicles and an industrial site in the region, with several cars burned.
Out of six missiles, two were intercepted and destroyed. Russia's electronic warfare capabilities disrupted the remaining four, causing them to miss the intended target, resulting in minor damage.
The Russian Defense Ministry warned of a firm retaliation against the "Western long-range weapons" attack, stating that it will not go unanswered.
The use of ATACMS missiles, capable of carrying nuclear payloads, has heightened international concern. Russia’s threats of nuclear retaliation have increased the risk of a broader conflict, emphasizing the need for diplomatic resolutions.
In a dramatic turn of events, Ukraine has once more launched a missile strike against Russian territory using United States-supplied ATACMS long-range systems.
The attack Wednesday, Dec. 11, targeted a military airfield in Taganrog, a southern Russian city, and further escalates tensions between the warring nations. According to the Russian Ministry of Defense (MOD), six ATACMS missiles were involved in the assault. While two of the missiles were intercepted and destroyed, the remaining four were reportedly disrupted by Russia's electronic warfare capabilities, causing them to deviate from their intended target.
Despite the apparent defense measures, the attack resulted in minor damage, with shrapnel from falling debris hitting two administrative buildings and several vehicles on the airfield. Acting Rostov Region Gov. Yury Slyusar provided additional details, confirming that the missiles also struck an industrial site in the region, where some 15 cars in the parking lot were burned.
The incident has sparked heated reactions both in Russia and internationally, as the U.S. and Ukraine move closer to the brink of a more severe conflict. Photographs released in the aftermath of the attack show damaged buildings and scattered debris, adding a stark visual testimony to the volatile nature of the ongoing conflict. Although the scale of casualties remains unclear, it was reported that Russian servicemen sustained injuries, underscoring the human cost of the exchange.
Russian Defense Ministry vows firm retaliation
...
Russia doesn't need nukes with Oreshnik. Just a couple of strategically placed non-nuke Oreshniks in Kiev could do plenty of damage to the country.
Estimates I've seen (and find questionable) are that Russia could produce between 10 and 30 Oreshniks per month...funds permitting. An arsenal of 300 of these would be a genuine strategic statement, especially as long as they remain unstoppable.
I suspect that NATO is desperate to get Russia to use another Oreshnik in order to gather more data about it (and consequently be able to better work out a defense.) [...]
That figure is completely made up, but jsut for the laughs... I would be very interested in knowing how an 18 Million missile that cannot, I repeat, cannot carry conventional explosives and has an accuracy of +/= 500 meters is going to help Ruzzia in any possible way. I just hope that the Ruzzian military geniuses follow your same "strategy".
You know what seems to be working correctly? The newly designed Ukrainian medium range missiles and missile / drone hybrids:
Ukraine will soon have no need for US approval to hit anything within 1000 km of the front.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdtZ8My341c
Ruzzia is minus one refinery in the last two days.... call Uzbekistan, they may have some spare for you.
Rumor has it that the North Koreans are finally doing some fighting in Russia...after months of BS lies and fearmongering about it from NATO.
It is said that one of the North Korean hard-core units walked 2km through mine fields to wipe out a contingent of zionazis. They are said to have been like a tornado. 300 zionazis KIA and not a single prisoner. Then the NK picked up their wounded and split. The whole thing took about 3 hours.
It is said that several Russian units are fighting over who gets credit for what is actually the handiwork of the North Koreans. Also projected that the North Koreans will work the Russian side of the border line then mop up within Kursk. I will be interested to see how much reality there is to these stories in the coming days. I get a bulk of my info from Military Summary Channel who have proven to be the most clear, conservative, and reliable as far as I can see. Kursk run-down at the end of here: https://rumble.com/v5yzwwh-energy-infrastructure-collapseduspenivka-fortified-area-falls-whats-next-to.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
[...]
Looks like zionazi departure from Kursk may correspond timing-wise with Russian entry into Dnepropetrovsk oblast. Both seem to me quite possible before Trump. That will be a fairly significant change in the bargaining chip pile.
Rumours are correct on the NK behing subject to meatwaving by the Ruzzians. More meat for the Empire.
Despite Ruzzia sluggishly gaining meter by meter of land, there are also some rumours pointing to Ukraine opening anothe line of advance, I am not privvy to where.
Interesting claim. I believe that Ukraine has clearly forbidden ANY video that allows Ruzzia to assess damage, gather information, locate troops in general, for any attack or for any other war related issue, so you may be right, I mean biased, but technically right.
But you seem to have inside information... or you are just parroting, which could be another option. Tell us Branko about your "damage assessment" of a few MIRVs wihtout any explosive load falling at random places in a city. What is the accuracy of an ICMB Branko? What is the cost? Comm'on prove you are not parroting.
I'm pretty sure if damage would be low Ukronazistan would be more than happy to show it.
Regarding damage, its surely bigger than UK Tridents who can't even test-fly that former
colonial empire seems can afford to test once per 10 years (and fail)
But you have made the claim, not Ukraine, go now and tell us. Let me help you: the renamed for marketing purposes missile used can use: a) nothing, b) decoys c) nuclear warheads. It did not carry nothing nor nuclear warheads. This below is a decoy, and has NO explosive whatsoever.
Now Branko, please, damage assessment of a chunk of metal falling randomly on a city.
Yes trust that *wink wink*. BTW again the Trident is an american missile... as old and reliable as rain and taxes.
It's cool that Grozny was bombed today, I'm very glad that Kadyrov is angry
Dennis Kucinich, Scott Ritter and Medea Benjamin met with citizens in Washington to discuss how they can get Congress to put a roadblock in the path towards nuclear annihilation.
The former Congressman, former chief U.N. weapons inspector and Code Pink leader spoke to an audience at the Tabard Inn in Washington on Saturday evening following an event at the National Press Club that was intended to get citizens to put pressure on Congress to back a resolution that would stop the U.S. transfer of long-range U.S. ATACM missiles to Ukraine.
WATCH: How to Stop a Nuclear War
https://m.youtube.com/watch?persist_app=1&app=m&v=vvt1PFfz0Ec&embeds_referring_euri=https%3A%2F%2Fconsortiumnews.com%2F&source_ve_path=OTY3MTQ
The U.S. is using the territory of Ukraine to fire these missiles deep into Russia territory. Moscow says that amounts to a direct U.S. strike on Russia, putting the two countries at war. The Kremlin warned that further U.S. escalation could lead to nuclear confrontation.
...
The former Congressman, former chief U.N. weapons inspector and Code Pink leader spoke to an audience at the Tabard Inn in Washington on Saturday evening following an event at the National Press Club that was intended to get citizens to put pressure on Congress to back a resolution that would stop the U.S. transfer of long-range U.S. ATACM missiles to Ukraine.
WATCH: How to Stop a Nuclear War
https://m.youtube.com/watch?persist_app=1&app=m&v=vvt1PFfz0Ec&embeds_referring_euri=https%3A%2F%2Fconsortiumnews.com%2F&source_ve_path=OTY3MTQ
The U.S. is using the territory of Ukraine to fire these missiles deep into Russia territory. Moscow says that amounts to a direct U.S. strike on Russia, putting the two countries at war. The Kremlin warned that further U.S. escalation could lead to nuclear confrontation.
...
Rumor has it that the North Koreans are finally doing some fighting in Russia...after months of BS lies and fearmongering about it from NATO.
It is said that one of the North Korean hard-core units walked 2km through mine fields to wipe out a contingent of zionazis. They are said to have been like a tornado. 300 zionazis KIA and not a single prisoner. Then the NK picked up their wounded and split. The whole thing took about 3 hours.
It is said that several Russian units are fighting over who gets credit for what is actually the handiwork of the North Koreans. Also projected that the North Koreans will work the Russian side of the border line then mop up within Kursk. I will be interested to see how much reality there is to these stories in the coming days. I get a bulk of my info from Military Summary Channel who have proven to be the most clear, conservative, and reliable as far as I can see. Kursk run-down at the end of here: https://rumble.com/v5yzwwh-energy-infrastructure-collapseduspenivka-fortified-area-falls-whats-next-to.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
---
Other amusing things:
Very expensive fortifications protecting Protrosk went unmanned. Turns out that the reason for this was that they never were built. The money had simply been stolen. Probably crypto had something to do with the flight.
Looks like zionazi departure from Kursk may correspond timing-wise with Russian entry into Dnepropetrovsk oblast. Both seem to me quite possible before Trump. That will be a fairly significant change in the bargaining chip pile.
Interesting claim. I believe that Ukraine has clearly forbidden ANY video that allows Ruzzia to assess damage, gather information, locate troops in general, for any attack or for any other war related issue, so you may be right, I mean biased, but technically right.
But you seem to have inside information... or you are just parroting, which could be another option. Tell us Branko about your "damage assessment" of a few MIRVs wihtout any explosive load falling at random places in a city. What is the accuracy of an ICMB Branko? What is the cost? Comm'on prove you are not parroting.
I'm pretty sure if damage would be low Ukronazistan would be more than happy to show it.
Regarding damage, its surely bigger than UK Tridents who can't even test-fly that former
colonial empire seems can afford to test once per 10 years (and fail)
You obvious do not know what you are talking about. Not in weapons terms, not in economic tersm... let's not fool ourselves, you just open your mouth because it happens to be there. Any ICBM or CBM is massively costly and adds nothing to the military capability of Ruzzia nor any other country other than using it for nuking things. What hit Dnipro was less effective than even using a few drones.
It is all right, keep blabing non-sense.
Ah, so that's why Ukraine sent 600 SBU people to lock whole area and prevent video leakage of damage...they want
to spare Russians some embarrassment
Interesting claim. I believe that Ukraine has clearly forbidden ANY video that allows Ruzzia to assess damage, gather information, locate troops in general, for any attack or for any other war related issue, so you may be right, I mean biased, but technically right.
But you seem to have inside information... or you are just parroting, which could be another option. Tell us Branko about your "damage assessment" of a few MIRVs wihtout any explosive load falling at random places in a city. What is the accuracy of an ICMB Branko? What is the cost? Comm'on prove you are not parroting.
[...]
Russia Launches Massive Attack On Ukrainian "Critical Fuel & Energy Infrastructure"
Russia Launches Massive Attack On Ukrainian "Critical Fuel & Energy Infrastructure"
Yes as usual. The caption should be Ruzzia does this and that... again.
It is less usual however to see Taganrog Ruzzia air base - on of the big and important ones - under Ukrainian fire....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPGskybnt8w
Among other stuff...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Taer9iAw9To
Russia doesn't really need Oreshniks. Here is (some of) their response to the latest Ukrainian ATACMS attack.
Reading between the lines, there are probably a whole bunch of top military people of the US and Nato all ready to go to real war. Why do I say this? Because the ATACMS attack was more like a little 'teaser' attack, trying to get Russia to do what they just did.
The point is that Zelensky has destroyed Ukraine, and is siphoning $$$ off the war money he is getting from the US and Nato.
Russia Launches Massive Attack On Ukrainian "Critical Fuel & Energy Infrastructure"
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/russia-launches-massive-attack-critical-fuel-energy-infrastructure-ukraine
Russia launched a massive drone and missile strike against Ukraine on Friday in retaliation for Kyiv's recent use of the US-supplied Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) against a Russian military base.
ABC News quoted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who said Russia launched 93 missiles and nearly 200 drones targeting the country's energy infrastructure. This was one of the largest bombardments against Ukraine's energy sector since the invasion began almost three years ago.
Zelenskyy said Ukrainian defense forces intercepted 81 missiles, including 11 cruise missiles shot down by Western-supplied General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon fighter jets.
...
Reading between the lines, there are probably a whole bunch of top military people of the US and Nato all ready to go to real war. Why do I say this? Because the ATACMS attack was more like a little 'teaser' attack, trying to get Russia to do what they just did.
The point is that Zelensky has destroyed Ukraine, and is siphoning $$$ off the war money he is getting from the US and Nato.
Russia Launches Massive Attack On Ukrainian "Critical Fuel & Energy Infrastructure"
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/russia-launches-massive-attack-critical-fuel-energy-infrastructure-ukraine
Russia launched a massive drone and missile strike against Ukraine on Friday in retaliation for Kyiv's recent use of the US-supplied Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) against a Russian military base.
ABC News quoted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who said Russia launched 93 missiles and nearly 200 drones targeting the country's energy infrastructure. This was one of the largest bombardments against Ukraine's energy sector since the invasion began almost three years ago.
Zelenskyy said Ukrainian defense forces intercepted 81 missiles, including 11 cruise missiles shot down by Western-supplied General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon fighter jets.
...
Russia doesn't need nukes with Oreshnik. Just a couple of strategically placed non-nuke Oreshniks in Kiev could do plenty of damage to the country.
Estimates I've seen (and find questionable) are that Russia could produce between 10 and 30 Oreshniks per month...funds permitting. An arsenal of 300 of these would be a genuine strategic statement, especially as long as they remain unstoppable.
I suspect that NATO is desperate to get Russia to use another Oreshnik in order to gather more data about it (and consequently be able to better work out a defense.) Russia would probably do well to defer on use and just build, built, build and develop a stockpile. They may as well save them for targets in the NATO countries who are attacking it when the time comes, and there-by limit the information available to the adversary. I mean, they are winning the missile part of the SMO action hands down as it is without 'exotic' weapons...the Iskander no longer being considered as such.
You obvious do not know what you are talking about. Not in weapons terms, not in economic tersm... let's not fool ourselves, you just open your mouth because it happens to be there. Any ICBM or CBM is massively costly and adds nothing to the military capability of Ruzzia nor any other country other than using it for nuking things. What hit Dnipro was less effective than even using a few drones.
It is all right, keep blabing non-sense.
Ah, so that's why Ukraine sent 600 SBU people to lock whole area and prevent video leakage of damage...they want
to spare Russians some embarrassment
Russia doesn't need nukes with Oreshnik. Just a couple of strategically placed non-nuke Oreshniks in Kiev could do plenty of damage to the country.
You obvious do not know what you are talking about. Not in weapons terms, not in economic tersm... let's not fool ourselves, you just open your mouth because it happens to be there. Any ICBM or CBM is massively costly and adds nothing to the military capability of Ruzzia nor any other country other than using it for nuking things. What hit Dnipro was less effective than even using a few drones.
It is all right, keep blabing non-sense.
You entirely ignore that Ukraine stopped. The only reason they are starting back up is that they seem to be getting more US funding. Oh well. Looks like Russia will be growing even stronger, again, as they take out more of Ukraine.
Did you know that Russia is considering launching an Oreshnik missile strike on the headquarters of Volodymyr Zelensky in Kiev?
I don't think Russia is seriously considering the option of physically eliminating Zelensky. Why, to make him a martyr and a hero, and to replace him with someone more competent and less drug-addicted?It would serve no purpose. An Oreshnik with nuclear warheads in Kiev would result in radiation spreading to NATO countries, thus an attack on NATO and worthy of an equivalente response. Any other ICBM without load does less damage and has less change of hitting a precise objective less than an Ishkander or Kalibr. dumBAss does not know any of this of course, he is just making up his narratives as usual.
paxmao, BADecker be so kind as to end your offtopic about Syria. In the section there is a topic with discussion of current events in Syria, there and continue the discussion, and here we are discussing Russia's war with Ukraine. Then don’t be outraged that your posts are deleted.
Thanks that is not a problem, I will open a thread specifically to discuss the topic of Ruzzia's issues in Syria.
Russia doesn't need nukes with Oreshnik. Just a couple of strategically placed non-nuke Oreshniks in Kiev could do plenty of damage to the country.
You obvious do not know what you are talking about. Not in weapons terms, not in economic tersm... let's not fool ourselves, you just open your mouth because it happens to be there. Any ICBM or CBM is massively costly and adds nothing to the military capability of Ruzzia nor any other country other than using it for nuking things. What hit Dnipro was less effective than even using a few drones.
It is all right, keep blabing non-sense.
Jump to: