Yeah, I think in most cases, casinos do have quite terrible ToS, particularly in crypto gambling. Unfortunately, letter of the law says if you sign up, and accept them, you must abide by them. I have issue with the "ironclad" clause where casino reserves the right to void winnings if suspicious activity is detected (paraphrasing) but is not required to provide evidence or clarity on what that is.
That part's clear: sign up, accept, and you abide by ToS.
But what OP points out is a change to ToS, and that I must agree is unlawful, if done without the customer being informed. Pretty sure that the legal consensus is that any change to contract must require agreement of all parties -- not sure if a ToS is a contract between player and casino but to me it means that users must explicitly agree to any ToS changes before they can be enforced. Disagree, and you withdraw your casino membership, simple as that.
I don't really think that a casino is lawfully supposed to inform the user if they make any changes in their terms and conditions or any rules because most of them even have it written in their terms and conditions that they have the right to make any changes or modification in the rules without the consent of the user and if a user agrees with the terms and conditions when signing up, they agree with this too.
But I do find it unethical if a casino simply modifies a rule or adds new ones without letting their customers know, after all, the rules or terms and conditions are for the customers to know and follow and if they don't know about them, there is simply no point in having them.
If that was stated on the time for a certain user who do just read it up before they do able to play then they cant really make out some complaints in regarding to that because it would really just simply be easily
counteract if ever there would be some suing just because its been stated on there on the first place unless if there's none then you could really make possibly fight on but we know that changing up terms
specially the crucial ones would definitely be putting up on someones mind some questions on how the heck they had been able to changed it up right away which is in lined with your current issue?
Of course you would really be having that kind of thinking that they might be able to changed it up just to make it look that theyre the ones who had been telling the truth. This is why it would really be that important
that you should really be reading up terms and if possible you should really be that making some screenshot if you are really that paranoid when it comes to changes or you do have some trust issues.
Somehow it is really hard to debate against with a platform knowing that they could really be able to show up some evidences that you had missed nor violated of their terms because we know that once a
certain thing is been violated then you cant really blame them on about being locked up or what.