Topic: Why do Atheists Hate Religion? - page 298. (Read 901367 times)

Religion is the opposite of science. I don't know what you're referring to, but it's not science. Science requires one to be able to change one's mind if facts change. Dogmatic religions - by definition - can't do that.



You're wrong on this point. Atheism means "without a god". That means atheists do not have any god or idol.

Since you're using wikipedia articles as references, here's one you should read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism

 

So you're still going with the "kill the infidel" option? You realise that you'd need to kill around 60% of the planet's population?

That's billions of people, not millions. You really want to be responsible for the biggest mass murder in history?

Are those countries Roman Catholic? After all, they didn't take part in the Crusades, did they?

What are you talking about? You need a better translator.



EDIT: No offense, but are you in an insane asylum?

You are doing quite well for a 12-y-o.

How about Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya?

Luckily NOT this.


Best regards.

This^^.

The Crusades were done by people who didn't understand that the way of Christianity isn't a violent, earthly-government one. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusades:
Because of this, what can anyone expect?... especially from strictly Roman Catholic countries like Italy and Spain and Portugal?

I'm not shy: it's called fear of God.

Fear of God leads to Science.

Science is what we all are trying to achieve here.


It means: "if you are reading this this phrase is for you that you are reading this".


This is a forum: what do you do in forums?


Why you are reading something that does not interest you?

That's confusing.



That's the Bible and the word of our Lord.


I said that atheism is a capital sin.
Atheism is a capital sin:
1) atheism means replacing God with an idol (sin for the 1st commandments - IDOLATRY - );
2) punishment to idolatry is death (Ex 32:4 - Golden Calf episode - source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_calf)


If you have doubts or info feel free to ask.



Best regards.

Jesus may have never said it the way that you do, but through the things that He said, he proclaimed it.


Jesus was talking to those who believe in His salvation when He said this.


What is the narrowness? The PJs are loads of some kind of "gospel." Since they don't teach the values of the Old Testament, they are not considered part of the New Testament. Any other so-called "gospels" that don't profess the things of the Old Testament and the New as it exists, will never be included in the New Testament. Even if they are correct, why add them? We have what we need to be saved right now, as it is.


Nobody says that, not even Christians. Jesus took our sins and mistakes. He did it without us even asking Him to. When He tells us about it, if we accept what He says as truth, then we are saved.



The Hebrew nation is the most stubborn nation of all. Phoenicia is gone. Egypt is barely hanging on. Greece has lost its splendor. Rome is gone. Thrace is gone. China has changed entirely over the millennia, even though we call it by the same name. Israel, the Hebrew nation, is one of the greatest nations of the world today.

The strength of Israel is God-strength. God will never let His name be defamed.

Hebrew tradition has always been to copy the Old Testament with complete accuracy. The scribes copied it accurately right down to the present. Christian Hebrew scribes even copy the New Testament accurately. There is no fallacy in the Bible itself. There may be mistakes in translations.

By Hebrew tradition, tradition that is stubbornly held by possibly the most stubborn nation of all, says that the Bible is accurate. The failure is among those who suggest that the Bible is inaccurate, and by people like you for believing such.

It's 12 hours later. Is that enough time for you? I honestly don't think I would consider you stupid for taking half a day to respond, so son't be shy - that was a 'yes', yes?




What does "I talk for the reader" mean? Are we having a conversation, or not? If we can't have a stable conversation without you monologuing all over the place, I'll go somewhere else for my interesting and challenging conversations.





I hope to god that I misunderstand this, but you're really coming across as a creepy satanic murderous fuck here.

You really want to kill everyone who doesn't agree with your philosophical belief in a particular god? Has civilisation not advanced at all in the last two thousand years?

This seems very demanding which is definitely the wrong approach. Demand is usually brought on by anger which is as previously stated the wrong approach. Statements without claim only create the ideal that one does not really know what they preach or are following suit with what they have been told.

I agree with you. We are on similar tracks.

Nothing against you but, I would rather remain saved that talk the same language as you.

Understandable English: I should have come to the other side of the Ocean to understand that.

That's a step: thank You.


Best regards.

People who ignore the bible.

Actually, MMH; I am not ignoring anything; here are the points that I made and YOU did not respond:



And here is another BIG point:
The Bible has been re-written and modified.

How do you call all this mess, than?

The bible is quite clear on it. There is no mess, unless you ignore the bible, as the pope and 1aguar do.

That's precisely why the Pope is in there: make order out of this mess.


Best regards.

Actually, it is a big deception; he never said it was OK to dump your wicked actions upon him or anyone else.
You want to be sovereign? Take some responsibility for your own actions!

Yes, I didn't mean to get into anything, was only just reminded of Beliathon, lol.

Yeah, I think the English language has been tampered with, as per our discussion on Common Law. It's sad no matter how much we may think we may know about things, it can all be turned upside down later.

The forgiveness for all sins is what Jesus is all about, and how glorious it is!

So, you believe that because you are a Christian?
Then are mistaken; a Christian follows the New Commandment (example of Jesus) and nothing more.
A misinformed person will think that Jesus is a savior, but he never once suggested that he was your "savior"; in fact, he said that the kingdom of God is not "here or there", i.e. in Jesus, but it is within YOU. The churches have misinformed the people. There were over 28 full gospels written and known. A scholar from South Germany chose the four which were placed into your New Testament--need I say more? How can you continue to be so narrow?

Align with the Pope and we will talk the same language.


Best regards.