[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 238.

URSAY

legendary

Activity: 1960

Merit: 1000

Quote from: atcsecure on October 03, 2014, 11:55:38 AM

Quote from: KimmyF on October 03, 2014, 11:46:03 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on October 03, 2014, 11:19:48 AM

Updated Wallet for XChat testing

http://downloads.xc-official.com/testing/v2.49/XCurrency_2.49.08b.exe

* Add's label

* Updated to resolve DUP msgs

Dan

Dan,

After the last time i asked did some research and now understand the need for re-entering the public key for Xchat.
But at the same time i feel this will limit the adaptation of XChat by non tech/altcoin people, just because its just a lot of hassle & they have no idea what a private key is. For many i know a XC address looks crazy enough.
Is there some (anon related) reason for not letting the wallet discover the public key by itself before encrypting the channel or do you think there is some way to build this tech into the core protocol before going public?

grtz

I have a different solution for this, using a basic blockchain 2.0 service, the user can register a nickname/alias assigned to the public/private key pair which eliminates that process altogether. Thus you just add the "nickname/alias"

Dan

I'm assuming you've checked out BitSharesX? Their nickname solution is pretty cool and sounds a lot like what your describing.

buy-black

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Funny, some one sold to the bullshit buy orders and not the buy side is healthy but the sell side is still full of air. Amazing that bittrex allows such manipulation of their order book.

buy-black

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

I have sent a mail to bittrex requesting they fix that here: https://bittrex.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/requests/new
maybe others should contact them too including DAN.
I can only see 0.025 BTC buy support... total bullshit

spookycoins

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

Quote from: buy-black on October 03, 2014, 12:44:50 PM

Any one see the book at bittrex? I just bought some more coins and had to eat a bunch of tiny orders to get to the meat. Bittrex needs to fix this kind of manipulation where you can not see the book.

Yeah, saw that too.
I hate that.

buy-black

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Any one see the book at bittrex? I just bought some more coins and had to eat a bunch of tiny orders to get to the meat. Bittrex needs to fix this kind of manipulation where you can not see the book.

Longenecker

full member

Activity: 226

Merit: 100

Quote from: spookycoins on October 03, 2014, 12:36:58 PM

Rublecon dev is stating Dan is providing a code review.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9067949

Doesn't matter to me.
Keep up the great work Dan.

Yes, let's give competitor coins who are touting decentralized trustless anon a code review to help establish their credibility. The more credible decentralized trustless anon options there are, the more appealing XC's decentralized trustless anon looks.

Wait a minute...

buy-black

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Quote from: atcsecure on October 03, 2014, 11:43:16 AM

Quote from: cryptico on October 03, 2014, 11:33:12 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on October 03, 2014, 11:19:48 AM

Updated Wallet for XChat testing

http://downloads.xc-official.com/testing/v2.49/XCurrency_2.49.08b.exe

* Add's label
* Updated to resolve DUP msgs
Dan

Dan that is a Rev 3 feature in the road map sneaky you! Grin

The requests for group chat drove this feature to the top of the list!!!!

On a side note, I've been contacted by several dev's on a various list of projects - just wanted to keep the community in the loop

* Ruble Code review
* Britcoin - license rev1 mixer code
* Utility Coin - collaboration
* Supernet - collaboration
Dan

Nice, thanks for sharing. The Supernet collaboration is very interesting to me since I believe this has a future.

spookycoins

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

Rublecoin dev is stating Dan is providing a code review.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9067949

Doesn't matter to me.
Keep up the great work Dan.

Mountaingoat

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 500

Quote from: KimmyF on October 03, 2014, 12:26:22 PM

Quote from: Mountaingoat on October 03, 2014, 11:49:59 AM

Quote from: KimmyF on October 03, 2014, 11:23:31 AM

Ok, there will be limitations in my block explorer.

Just finished a dynamic caching module in the back-end because some transactions where just to much for a browser to handle.
eg: if one or more outputs are not spend i let the browser render the graph, if all outputs are spend the svg is served without the need for any end-user processing. Simply because unspend outputs can change the graph & i needed some simple & quick caching able to run in the cloud.

But visualizing seemingly simple things can give crazy results, check this out: Thats a 6x times zoom in
[snip]
(https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?f14319b3154e5f6f1c0c46af46159d46308abb47b4e86710af23d8885e81d964.htm)

Just someone scraping together about 300 seperate inputs into a single tx-out without time-frame, this has nothing to do with anon (no multisigs)

Funny to see how (only for XC) regulair Anon transactions are more easy to handle by a browser (visual tech wise) and how some people had concerns about bloat because of the XCoinshuffle thats part of the anon:D

Overall ... am almost there ...

Where do you get that stuff from? People say it looks awesome, but I honestly can't figure out why or even how to read it.

Do you need to download a program for it?

All im making is a blockchain explorer but next to showing the raw data like hashes and stuff i also add a flow diagram visualizing where those coins came from and where they where send after the transaction. Nothing more, nothing less. Most transactions are really simple like this POS one:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?58e8db4571c543116360d5be54fb8779b6e8b52e961a7145413e075d5f126c8a.htm
i just think that a display with all those hashes is not helping the wider adoptation of (alt)coins. So next to the same info i add this:
[snip]
Looks better & is more easy to understand imo. Also important in my view: XC has the option to send anon, by digging all info i can get out of the chain im hoping to add to the prove thats true.
Most examples posted before where complex but its a fact that a lot more transactions on the chain are really simple like:
[snip]

All will be just a website, so all you will need is a browser and url to go to. But if you come by with a older browser my site will disappoint you, for stuff like this you need to have a recent browser. So no download, just a different way of showing the same info online.

What is your site? I can't find it.

cryptico

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: laredo7mm on October 03, 2014, 12:30:17 PM

Quote from: KimmyF on October 03, 2014, 12:28:01 PM

Am i the only one happy that Dan posted his current dealings with other coins/projects or what?

No, but you and I might be the only ones. Wink

I'm happy too but what's the story with utilitycoin??

bitcoin carpenter

legendary

Activity: 1582

Merit: 1001

Go vote
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/which-coin-will-become-the-communication-giant-of-the-crypto-world-809368

laredo7mm

hero member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 537

Quote from: Longenecker on October 03, 2014, 12:28:13 PM

Quote from: laredo7mm on October 03, 2014, 12:26:31 PM

Quote from: Longenecker on October 03, 2014, 12:20:10 PM

...blah, blah, blah...

Again, no commitments have been made to do anything, as far as I can see.

Everyone knows Dan does code reviews and will collaborate with other coins. That isn't a secret. When he does, those coins get a pump on the market. the issue in the past is that other coins have announced the review/collaboration before they were officially announced here. When that happens, the XC Community misses out on the opportunity to ride the pump and make some money if they desired to speculate on that coin.

All Dan did was give a heads up as to which coins have contacted him for reviews or collaboration in case people here may be interested in investing in those coins to try and make some money. That is it. Plain an simple. IMO.

My point is in the foolishness of collaborating with coins such as utilitycoin (1 week old, anonymous dev, thread is 10 pages long...). What do you not understand? The fact that Dan is even considering it is the problem.

I understand everything completely. You do not.

Contacted does not equal considering. Collecting information and investigating does not equal considering.

Once the information is collected, then comes time to consider. If it is an obvious shit coin, then it will be an easy choice to deny their request.

MemoryShock

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 500

Quote from: KimmyF on October 03, 2014, 12:28:01 PM

Am i the only one happy that Dan posted his current dealings with other coins/projects or what?

Nope. I also think that he has his reasons which have been shown to be pretty awesome in the past.

Some people can't be pleased...

laredo7mm

hero member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 537

Quote from: KimmyF on October 03, 2014, 12:28:01 PM

Am i the only one happy that Dan posted his current dealings with other coins/projects or what?

No, but you and I might be the only ones. Wink

Longenecker

full member

Activity: 226

Merit: 100

Quote from: laredo7mm on October 03, 2014, 12:26:31 PM

Quote from: Longenecker on October 03, 2014, 12:20:10 PM

...blah, blah, blah...

Again, no commitments have been made to do anything, as far as I can see.

Everyone knows Dan does code reviews and will collaborate with other coins. That isn't a secret. When he does, those coins get a pump on the market. the issue in the past is that other coins have announced the review/collaboration before they were officially announced here. When that happens, the XC Community misses out on the opportunity to ride the pump and make some money if they desired to speculate on that coin.

All Dan did was give a heads up as to which coins have contacted him for reviews or collaboration in case people here may be interested in investing in those coins to try and make some money. That is it. Plain an simple. IMO.

My point is in the foolishness of collaborating with coins such as utilitycoin (1 week old, anonymous dev, thread is 10 pages long...). What do you not understand? The fact that Dan is even considering it is the problem.

KimmyF

sr. member

Activity: 978

Merit: 250

Am i the only one happy that Dan posted his current dealings with other coins/projects or what?

laredo7mm

hero member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 537

Quote from: Longenecker on October 03, 2014, 12:20:10 PM

...blah, blah, blah...

Again, no commitments have been made to do anything, as far as I can see.

Everyone knows Dan does code reviews and will collaborate with other coins. That isn't a secret. When he does, those coins get a pump on the market. the issue in the past is that other coins have announced the review/collaboration before they were officially announced here. When that happens, the XC Community misses out on the opportunity to ride the pump and make some money if they desired to speculate on that coin.

All Dan did was give a heads up as to which coins have contacted him for reviews or collaboration in case people here may be interested in investing in those coins to try and make some money. That is it. Plain and simple. IMO.

KimmyF

sr. member

Activity: 978

Merit: 250

Quote from: Mountaingoat on October 03, 2014, 11:49:59 AM

Quote from: KimmyF on October 03, 2014, 11:23:31 AM

Ok, there will be limitations in my block explorer.

Just finished a dynamic caching module in the back-end because some transactions where just to much for a browser to handle.
eg: if one or more outputs are not spend i let the browser render the graph, if all outputs are spend the svg is served without the need for any end-user processing. Simply because unspend outputs can change the graph & i needed some simple & quick caching able to run in the cloud.

But visualizing seemingly simple things can give crazy results, check this out: Thats a 6x times zoom in
[snip]
(https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?f14319b3154e5f6f1c0c46af46159d46308abb47b4e86710af23d8885e81d964.htm)

Just someone scraping together about 300 seperate inputs into a single tx-out without time-frame, this has nothing to do with anon (no multisigs)

Funny to see how (only for XC) regulair Anon transactions are more easy to handle by a browser (visual tech wise) and how some people had concerns about bloat because of the XCoinshuffle thats part of the anon:D

Overall ... am almost there ...

Where do you get that stuff from? People say it looks awesome, but I honestly can't figure out why or even how to read it.

Do you need to download a program for it?

All im making is a blockchain explorer but next to showing the raw data like hashes and stuff i also add a flow diagram visualizing where those coins came from and where they where send after the transaction. Nothing more, nothing less. Most transactions are really simple like this POS one:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?58e8db4571c543116360d5be54fb8779b6e8b52e961a7145413e075d5f126c8a.htm
i just think that a display with all those hashes is not helping the wider adoptation of (alt)coins. So next to the same info i add this:

Looks better & is more easy to understand imo. Also important in my view: XC has the option to send anon, by digging all info i can get out of the chain im hoping to add to the prove thats true.
Most examples posted before where complex but its a fact that a lot more transactions on the chain are really simple like:

All will be just a website, so all you will need is a browser and url to go to. But if you come by with a older browser my site will disappoint you, for stuff like this you need to have a recent browser. So no download, just a different way of showing the same info online.

lucky88888

sr. member

Activity: 404

Merit: 250

https://nxtforum.org/

what the... utility coin sounds exactly like getscamed coin.

even if the code is legit and the dev does some coding. i mean do we really need a coin for every subject in our daily lives?
watercoin gascoin taxcoin furniturecoin foodcoin applecoin vegetablecoin meatcoin fishcoin sexcoin swearcoin might as well have underwear coin.

Longenecker

full member

Activity: 226

Merit: 100

Quote from: cryptico on October 03, 2014, 12:23:00 PM

@ Dan Didn't you say that we were not going to be part of supernet?

Yes he did. So the collaboration is likely of a different nature. We will have to wait and see.

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 238. (Read 1484189 times)