[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 240.

sugarboy321

sr. member

Activity: 361

Merit: 250

Quote from: KimmyF on October 03, 2014, 11:23:31 AM

Ok, there will be limitations in my block explorer.

Just finished a dynamic caching module in the back-end because some transactions where just to much for a browser to handle.
eg: if one or more outputs are not spend i let the browser render the graph, if all outputs are spend the svg is served without the need for any end-user processing. Simply because unspend outputs can change the graph & i needed some simple & quick caching able to run in the cloud.

But visualizing seemingly simple things can give crazy results, check this out: Thats a 6x times zoom in

Just someone scraping together about 300 seperate inputs into a single tx-out without time-frame, this has nothing to do with anon (no multisigs)

Funny to see how (only for XC) regulair Anon transactions are more easy to handle by a browser (visual tech wise) and how some people had concerns about bloat because of the XCoinshuffle thats part of the anon:D

Overall ... am almost there ...

It's Beautiful....

KimmyF

sr. member

Activity: 978

Merit: 250

Ok, there will be limitations in my block explorer.

Just finished a dynamic caching module in the back-end because some transactions where just to much for a browser to handle.
eg: if one or more outputs are not spend i let the browser render the graph, if all outputs are spend the svg is served without the need for any end-user processing. Simply because unspend outputs can change the graph & i needed some simple & quick caching able to run in the cloud.

But visualizing seemingly simple things can give crazy results, check this out: Thats a 6x times zoom in

(https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?f14319b3154e5f6f1c0c46af46159d46308abb47b4e86710af23d8885e81d964.htm)

Just someone scraping together about 300 seperate inputs into a single tx-out without time-frame, this has nothing to do with anon (no multisigs)

Funny to see how (only for XC) regulair Anon transactions are more easy to handle by a browser (visual tech wise) and how some people had concerns about bloat because of the XCoinshuffle thats part of the anon:D

Overall ... am almost there ...

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Updated Wallet for XChat testing

http://downloads.xc-official.com/testing/v2.49/XCurrency_2.49.08b.exe

* Add's label

* Updated to resolve DUP msgs

Dan

the_game1224

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

Happy Friday everyone!

Haven't been on here as much lately and was just curious what the XC team members are working on right now? Sort of like what was listed in the old daily updates.

Thanks and I hope everyone has a good weekend Grin

sugarboy321

sr. member

Activity: 361

Merit: 250

Quote from: Sabretooth on October 03, 2014, 09:56:24 AM

Quote from: battbot on October 03, 2014, 09:55:14 AM

Quote from: Sabretooth on October 03, 2014, 09:52:32 AM

Quote from: battbot on October 02, 2014, 08:21:52 PM

Nice to read that a review by Kristov Atlas is in the cards for XC.

Links please?

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2i3ksa/xcurrencys_revolutionary_privacy_advancement/ckywn60

Thanks

Read the entire post, lmao buncha kids.

infinitechaos

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: cryptico on October 03, 2014, 07:15:20 AM

https://twitter.com/moolah_io/status/517983600458104833

Moolah asking for suggestions of new features to implement in the site. Can someone with a twitter account suggest a XC to fiat pair?

thx

Have you seen the FIAT horror stories over at Moolah's subreddit?

http://www.reddit.com/r/Moolah

Some people have waited 4+ months for withdrawals. I would suggest that if you plan to use Mintpal's USD pairings that you start small and see if they've improved their FIAT services at all.

CryptoGretzky

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

Quote from: KimmyF on October 03, 2014, 10:00:36 AM

Quote from: CryptoGretzky on October 03, 2014, 05:43:35 AM

Quote from: cryptico on October 03, 2014, 04:49:23 AM

we need to step up the game I have a feeling that rev 2.5 and rev 3 will not be too far from each other as Dan is already working on group chat that should have been a Rev3 release.

After the code reviews I believe xc will gain the crown of 1st crypto innovator as it should be.

I am not even concerned about any short term pricing of XC anymore.
...

Yes, same here, all price info i have atm comes from remarks in this thread so i can gueass a range but thats about it. Used to run multiple actual price screens

But you are stretching it a bit with the shell bug. Was btw shocking to read some guy lost 750BTC over it.

The shellshock exploitation is not stretching it as much as the fud that XC has to endure from some other coin shills.... Its definitely within the realm of being exploited by NSA like the heart bleed bug.

NSA knew about the heart bleed bug for years and have used it. How many years did the NSA knew about the shellshock bug this time? How many Linux based machine has been infected out there now? How many masternode based mixers?

reebokasss

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

xc pierced 0,5 $ and BTC are still dropping everyday.. we need some good news!!

KimmyF

sr. member

Activity: 978

Merit: 250

Quote from: CryptoGretzky on October 03, 2014, 05:43:35 AM

Quote from: cryptico on October 03, 2014, 04:49:23 AM

we need to step up the game I have a feeling that rev 2.5 and rev 3 will not be too far from each other as Dan is already working on group chat that should have been a Rev3 release.

After the code reviews I believe xc will gain the crown of 1st crypto innovator as it should be.

I am not even concerned about any short term pricing of XC anymore.
...

Yes, same here, all price info i have atm comes from remarks in this thread so i can gueass a range but thats about it. Used to run multiple actual price screens

But you are stretching it a bit with the shell bug. Was btw shocking to read some guy lost 750BTC over it.

Sabretooth

full member

Activity: 138

Merit: 100

Quote from: battbot on October 03, 2014, 09:55:14 AM

Quote from: Sabretooth on October 03, 2014, 09:52:32 AM

Quote from: battbot on October 02, 2014, 08:21:52 PM

Nice to read that a review by Kristov Atlas is in the cards for XC.

Links please?

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2i3ksa/xcurrencys_revolutionary_privacy_advancement/ckywn60

Thanks

battbot

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

Quote from: Sabretooth on October 03, 2014, 09:52:32 AM

Quote from: battbot on October 02, 2014, 08:21:52 PM

Nice to read that a review by Kristov Atlas is in the cards for XC.

Links please?

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2i3ksa/xcurrencys_revolutionary_privacy_advancement/ckywn60

Sabretooth

full member

Activity: 138

Merit: 100

Quote from: battbot on October 02, 2014, 08:21:52 PM

Nice to read that a review by Kristov Atlas is in the cards for XC.

Links please?

policymaker

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Crypto Currency Supporter

Quote from: illodin on October 03, 2014, 07:58:17 AM

Quote from: sugarboy321 on October 03, 2014, 03:20:29 AM

I laugh in their general direction.

As soon as XC integrates VOIP with Video, "Game over man, game over."

And if "VOIP with Video" is deemed a useful and desired feature that absolutely for some reason has to be implemented within a crypto coin, is there a reason Darkcoin couldn't implement it (or to follow the suit of XC, add it to their roadmap)?

If you really need that feature now, these are just the couple of the first google hits I got - why would someone go through the trouble of buying coins so they can make VOIP calls when they can use already existing free software?
http://zfoneproject.com/
http://www.ibtimes.com/what-tox-hackers-develop-secure-private-skype-alternative-1675704

Decentralized private VOIP calls is a world first for XC, and like previously mentioned, coins and crypto land is just part of the whole XC package. If you had been truly interested in XC as a true potential investor with no other agenda, you would have known that the team has repeatedly said that several XC features using the platform will be independent of the crypto deal, it's to every1's advantage to have people use the XC app even if they are not actually interested in any coins.

cryptico

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Synechist do you have anyone working on a Q&A antifud newbie quicklink reference guide? that will be needed to direct new users that will pop in here in the near future.

sugarboy321

sr. member

Activity: 361

Merit: 250

Quote from: illodin on October 03, 2014, 07:58:17 AM

Quote from: sugarboy321 on October 03, 2014, 03:20:29 AM

I laugh in their general direction.

As soon as XC integrates VOIP with Video, "Game over man, game over."

And if "VOIP with Video" is deemed a useful and desired feature that absolutely for some reason has to be implemented within a crypto coin, is there a reason Darkcoin couldn't implement it (or to follow the suit of XC, add it to their roadmap)?

If you really need that feature now, these are just the couple of the first google hits I got - why would someone go through the trouble of buying coins so they can make VOIP calls when they can use already existing free software?
http://zfoneproject.com/
http://www.ibtimes.com/what-tox-hackers-develop-secure-private-skype-alternative-1675704

Yes, very good last point.

Maybe only useful to merchants dealing with XC and users like us.

CryptoGretzky

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

Quote from: illodin on October 03, 2014, 07:58:17 AM

Quote from: sugarboy321 on October 03, 2014, 03:20:29 AM

I laugh in their general direction.

As soon as XC integrates VOIP with Video, "Game over man, game over."

And if "VOIP with Video" is deemed a useful and desired feature that absolutely for some reason has to be implemented within a crypto coin, is there a reason Darkcoin couldn't implement it (or to follow the suit of XC, add it to their roadmap)?

If you really need that feature now, these are just the couple of the first google hits I got - why would someone go through the trouble of buying coins so they can make VOIP calls when they can use already existing free software?
http://zfoneproject.com/
http://www.ibtimes.com/what-tox-hackers-develop-secure-private-skype-alternative-1675704

You know in this world... it's not always about who's first right? Apple don't necessarily come out with the innovation, but they innovate so that it's "easy and acccessible". You don't even have to be best, just sufficient.

Case in point. NFC has been on Android phone forever, so what? Apple comes out and bring the big gun, hooks users up to 220k merchants. (Accessible).

No private VOIP has been really accessible so far. The trophy is still waiting to be claimed.

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Quote from: illodin on October 03, 2014, 07:58:17 AM

Quote from: sugarboy321 on October 03, 2014, 03:20:29 AM

I laugh in their general direction.

As soon as XC integrates VOIP with Video, "Game over man, game over."

And if "VOIP with Video" is deemed a useful and desired feature that absolutely for some reason has to be implemented within a crypto coin, is there a reason Darkcoin couldn't implement it (or to follow the suit of XC, add it to their roadmap)?

If you really need that feature now, these are just the couple of the first google hits I got - why would someone go through the trouble of buying coins so they can make VOIP calls when they can use already existing free software?
http://zfoneproject.com/
http://www.ibtimes.com/what-tox-hackers-develop-secure-private-skype-alternative-1675704

Who says you'll need to buy coins?

But thanks for the links. That Zfone thing might be legit, though Tox isn't truly distributed (it uses DHT).

It's a desirable feature for a distributed privacy-centric web 3.0 platform. It's not a particularly desirable feature for a currency.

(Yes, XC isn't a "coin".)

illodin

hero member

Activity: 966

Merit: 1003

Quote from: sugarboy321 on October 03, 2014, 03:20:29 AM

I laugh in their general direction.

As soon as XC integrates VOIP with Video, "Game over man, game over."

And if "VOIP with Video" is deemed a useful and desired feature that absolutely for some reason has to be implemented within a crypto coin, is there a reason Darkcoin couldn't implement it (or to follow the suit of XC, add it to their roadmap)?

If you really need that feature now, these are just the couple of the first google hits I got - why would someone go through the trouble of buying coins so they can make VOIP calls when they can use already existing free software?
http://zfoneproject.com/
http://www.ibtimes.com/what-tox-hackers-develop-secure-private-skype-alternative-1675704

cryptico

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: synechist on October 03, 2014, 07:20:16 AM

Quote from: cryptico on October 03, 2014, 07:15:20 AM

https://twitter.com/moolah_io/status/517983600458104833

Moolah asking for suggestions of new features to implement in the site. Can someone with a twitter account suggest a XC to fiat pair?

thx

Nice one. Replied.

Let's all pile in!

cool thx:)

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Quote from: cryptico on October 03, 2014, 07:15:20 AM

https://twitter.com/moolah_io/status/517983600458104833

Moolah asking for suggestions of new features to implement in the site. Can someone with a twitter account suggest a XC to fiat pair?

thx

Nice one. Replied.

Let's all pile in!

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 240. (Read 1484189 times)