A gambit that may backfire .. time will tell ..
Triff ..
I'm not sure I'd call it entirely a gambit. Perhaps it is parlaying the situation.
I believe the devs when they say:
1. They want to do the work deliberately and carefully.
2. They have some fundamental changes to make (database, clean up etc.) first.
3. They all have limited time as they are not getting rich from a premine and therefore work.
Then the idea that "slow to bring features" which will allow the less tech adept to enter is a side effect of the current focus and pace.
I agree with you though it could backfire. And the longer they take to get some fundamental coding finished the more likely the failure.
I don't think we are in danger yet, but I'd still like to see some notable progress soon.
There is most certainly no gambit. We have provided temporary solutions while we do important work on the foundation:
1. Memory/database: Increase swap space, this is reported to work fine for storing the blockchain in virtual memory (most of the blockchain is never accessed so it can safely stay in swap with acceptable performance).
2. GUI: Use one of the third party GUIs, the development of which we sponsored and supported (and continue to support, if unofficially).